Relevance study in the accreditation process of a university degree in the Ecuadorian context
Main Article Content
Abstract
The analysis shows that the vast majority of countries frame their process of evaluating the quality of higher education based on standards, i.e. with areas, criteria and indicators adapted to local or regional contexts. It should be noted that the criteria of relevance, organization, professors, curriculum and students are common in many of the cases studied, while the other criterion holds that the analysis of quality should be done by models and through the use of variables and dimensions that tend to be more specific at the time of evaluation, regardless of the path chosen for the evaluation process, it is positive, from every point of view, to know in what conditions an institution is in, even more so if the field is educational and also because they direct us to the decision making and actions that must be taken after being notified of the result, it is possible after the process to choose the appropriate corrective measures that will be applied in the improvement plan. In addition, this article considers in a practical way the author's experience in several years as director of the career Pedagogy of Experimental Sciences of Mathematics and Physics at the University of Guayaquil, Ecuador, and that he is immersed in evaluating each and every one of the criteria in the process of accreditation and educational quality assurance
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides free access to its content through its website following the principle that making research available free of charge to the public supports a larger exchange of global knowledge.
Web content of the journal is distributed under a
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work, provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the internet before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work.
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
References
Acosta, B. (2016). Evaluation Models for Career Accreditation:
Analysis of its composition and a proposal for careers in
Ecuador. Mexican Journal of Educational Research. RMIE,
, VOL. 21, NUM. 71, PP. 1249-1274 (ISSN: 14056666).
Barros-Bastidas, C., & Gebera, O. T. (2020). Training in research
and its incidence in the scientific production of teachers in
education of a public university of Ecuador. Publicaciones de
La Facultad de Educacion y Humanidades Del Campus de
Melilla, 50(2), 167–185.
https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v50i2.13952
Borroto, E. , & Salas, R. (2004). University accreditation and
evaluation. Higher Medical Education, 18(3), 1.
http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-
&lng=es&tlng=es
Camacaro, P. R., & Jubilado, D. T. (2018). Towards an approach to
quality assessment in Higher Education. Rev. Atlante: Cuad.
Educ. Des.[journal on the internet]. Available at:
https://www.eumed.net/rev/atlante/2018/02/calidadeducacion-superior.html
CEAACES (2013c). Modelo genérico para la evaluación de las
carreras presenciales y semipresenciales de las universidades
y escuelas politécnicas del Ecuador, Quito: Consejo de
Evaluación, Acreditación y Aseguramiento de la Calidad de la
Educación Superior.
CES. Council of Higher Education (2013). The academic regime
regulations.
RPC-SO-31-No. XXX-2013. Chapter III. Reglamento. Quito:
Higher Education Council, CES; 2013.
De Zapata, C. V. (2013). Criteria and Indicators to Evaluate the
Quality of Education in Higher Education Institutions.
Herrera, M. (2018). Accreditation and evaluation of processes in the
Nursing career at the Southern State University of ManabÃ.
Educación Médica Superior. 2018;32(4). Available at:
http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ems/v32n4/a011_1513.pdf
Herrera, M. and Aguilar, E. (2009). Quality assessment and
accreditation in the public university in Latin America.
Universidades. Jan-Mar;(40):29-39.
LOES. Organic Law of Higher Education. Official Register No. 298;
Morresi, S. and Arnaudo, M. (2014). Higher education institutions
facing The challenges of society. Análisis un caso. In XIV
International Colloquium on university management.
Florianópolis: Federal University of Santa Catarina. p. 1-13.
RodrÃguez, J. (2018) "Valuations about the relationship between
professional and research competencies". Rev. Cubana Edu.
Superior [online]. 2019, vol.38, n.1, e13. ISSN 0257-4314.
Available at: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rces/v38n1/0257-4314-
rces-38-01-e13.pdf
Seminara, M.P. (2018). A look at university educational quality:
Who fails at dropout? In J.C. Tovar-Gálvez (Ed.), Trends and
challenges in Higher Education in Latin America, (pp. 159-
. Eindhoven, NL: Adaya Press.
Silas, J. (n/d). Quality and Accreditation in Higher Education:
Realities and Challenges for Latin America. Available at:
http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/pe/v7n2/v7n2a06.pdf
SINAES. (2011). GuÃa para la autoevaluación de carreras, San José,
Costa Rica: Sistema Nacional de Acreditación de la Educación
Superior, pp. 1-40. Available at:
https://documentos.una.ac.cr/handle/unadocs/6064
Suárez, L.; Barrios, I. and Gonzáles, M. (2007). "Sistema de
Evaluación y Acreditación de Carreras Universitarias.
Implantación en el Instituto Superior de Ciencias Médicas de
la Habana, Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas", vol. 6, no.
, pp.1-11
